JUNE 18, 2026
7 MIN READ

Post-SOC 2: Which Framework Should You Tackle Next?

Post-SOC 2: Which Framework Should You Tackle Next?
Earned SOC 2? Here's how to choose your next compliance framework—from CMMC to HIPAA to ISO 27001—based on your buyers, data, and markets

For a lot of companies, SOC 2 feels like the finish line. In practice, it’s the foundation. 

Earning it is real work. It proves your security program is real, repeatable, and built to hold up under scrutiny.  It opens doors to new customers and markets, but those customers may have requirements that go beyond SOC 2. So the next question lands fast: what comes next?

The answer has little to do with which framework sounds most impressive. It comes down to three questionswho you sell to, what data you handle, and which markets you want to grow into.

A defense contractor chasing Department of Defense work faces a different path than a healthcare company handling protected health information. An enterprise software vendor growing into regulated markets has to prove maturity across several standards, none of which carry SOC 2's name recognition in the SaaS world.

Here's where teams stall. They try to stack frameworks as fast as possible, treating each one as a separate project with its own audit, its own evidence, its own scramble. The teams that get this right do the reverse: they treat SOC 2 as the foundation and build a roadmap around the requirements their buyers actually pay for.

This is a practical post-SOC 2 playbook. It covers the frameworks that come next for three common paths:

  • Defense and government

  • Healthcare

  • General regulated enterprise buyers

The aim is straightforward: build one strong control environment, reuse evidence across frameworks, and expand into the standards that match your market.

Defense and Government Buyers

Do you sellinto defense, federal, or public sector environments? SOC 2 demonstrates baseline maturity, but government  programs are built around prescriptive control mapping and independent validation that SOC 2 was not designed to provide.

The frameworks that matter here:

  • NIST SP 800-171

  • CMMC

  • FedRAMP

  • StateRAMP, for state and local motions

  • ITAR and similar contractual obligations, where they apply

Which one comes first depends on the buyer you're actually chasing. If you handle Controlled Unclassified Information or want to support DoD contracts, NIST 800-171 and CMMC move to the center fast.CMMC becomes a market access requirement, full stop. No certification, no contract. If you're selling a cloud product directly to federal agencies, FedRAMP becomes the bigger milestone, and it's a serious one: most teams spend 12 to 18 months and well into six figures reaching authorization. Tie that investment to a real federal go-to-market motion before you start.

Take a Series B data analytics vendor that earned SOC 2 to close commercial deals, then won a subcontract on a DoD program. SOC 2 got them in the room. The prime contractor's flow-down clauses required NIST 800-171 compliance and a path to CMMC, and the vendor's existing SOC 2 controls already covered a meaningful share of the 110 NIST requirements. They mapped what they had, closed the gaps, and skipped the rebuild.

That's the move for defense and government teams. Identify the specific government buyer before you scope anything. Map your SOC 2 controls to NIST-based requirements to see what carries over. Separate near-term deal blockers from long-term market expansion, and build the roadmap around contract reality instead of abstract ambition.

For these teams, more compliance is a given. The real decision is sequencing, or determining which government path matters first.

Healthcare Buyers

Do you handle protected health information, or sell into organizations that do? The post-SOC 2 conversation moves to HIPAA fast, and for many teams, HITRUST follows close behind.

The frameworks that matter here:

  • HIPAA

  • HITRUST

  • ISO 27001, where global or broader enterprise trust is in play

HIPAA is the floor. The moment you create, receive, maintain, or transmit PHI, whether directly or through a workflow that touches it,you're on the hook for its administrative, technical, and physical safeguards. SOC 2 covers a chunk of that ground already, so the work is mapping what you have to HIPAA's specific requirements and closing the gaps, not starting over.

HITRUST is where healthcare buyers go when they want a certifiable, healthcare-specific assurance layer on top of those safeguards. It's more rigorous and more resource-intensive than HIPAA readiness, and that's the point. Large health systems and payers often treat a HITRUST certification as the price of entry. The sequencing question is straightforward: get HIPAA operational discipline solid first, then pursue HITRUST when a specific deal or buyer demands it. Reverse that order and you're certifying on a shaky foundation.

Take a digital health startup that earned SOC 2 to land its first commercial customers, then entered diligence with a regional hospital network. The security review wasn't really about SOC 2. It was about whether PHI was handled correctly at every step, and whether the startup could produce a HITRUST roadmap. SOC 2 opened the conversation. HIPAA alignment and a HITRUST plan closed it.

For healthcare teams, the best roadmap follows the data. Map your security program to how regulated health data actually moves through your business, and the framework sequence falls out of that.

General Regulated Enterprise Buyers

For enterprise sellers in regulated industries, there's rarely one universal next framework. The right move is matching your assurance posture to the buyer in front of you and the data you handle.

The candidates:

  • ISO 27001

  • PCI DSS, when payment card data is in scope

  • Privacy obligations like GDPR or CCPA, by geography and data practice

  • NIST CSF as a reference model

  • ISO 42001 and AI governance overlays, when AI risk enters the deal

ISO 27001 is the most common next step. Enterprise and global buyers recognize it, it signals a managed, internationally accepted security program, and it shares enough DNA with SOC 2 that your existing controls carry real weight. 

PCI DSS belongs on the list only if cardholder data is genuinely in scope, since it's a specific obligation, not a general-purpose credential, and bolting it on without that data does nothing but burn cycles. 

Privacy requirements work differently again: GDPR and CCPA aren't certifications you pass, but they shape buyer diligence and your internal controls, so they earn a place in the roadmap. AI governance is the newest entry, and it's showing up in real deals, so when your product makes automated decisions, carries model risk, or touches sensitive data, expect ISO 42001 and similar overlays to come up.

The discipline that ties this together: tie every framework to a real business reason, whether that’s buyer demand, data handling, geography, or product scope, and build on a common control set so evidence collection doesn't fragment into separate audits in separate silos. Enterprise buyers in regulated sectors aren't counting your certifications. They're checking whether your control environment is mature, documented, and able to adapt.

Take a fintech vendor selling into European banks. SOC 2 covered the security baseline, but the deals stalled on two fronts: buyers wanted ISO 27001 for international recognition, and GDPR obligations shaped every diligence questionnaire. The vendor mapped its SOC 2 controls into an ISO 27001 management system, layered in GDPR-specific evidence, and reused the same control set for both. One environment, two requirements answered.

For regulated enterprise growth, the right framework is the one that clears buyer friction without piling on operational drag.

What Comes Next After SOC 2

SOC 2 is a real milestone. It shouldn't dictate your entire compliance strategy.

What comes next is shaped by your customers, your data, and your growth motion. For defense and government teams, that's CMMC, NIST 800-171, or FedRAMP. For healthcare, it's HIPAA and, when buyers demand it, HITRUST. For broader enterprise deals, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, privacy requirements, and AI governance enter the picture as your product and markets dictate.

The common thread? Don't rebuild from scratch every time the market asks for another framework. Build on the foundation SOC 2 gave you, map controls intelligently, and expand on real buyer needs. That's how post-SOC 2 maturity becomes regulated-market readiness.

Ready to try Drata? Schedule a demo. And stay tuned for the next posts in this series. We’ll dive deeper into these segments and what those GRC teams should focus on next after achieving their SOC 2 attestations. 


Image
Gretel Witt
Senior GRC Analyst

Gretel Witt is a Senior GRC Analyst at Drata with a background in technology compliance, assurance, risk, audit, and internal audit. A CISA-certified compliance professional, she brings a practical, audit-informed perspective to modern compliance programs and helps teams build trust through stronger governance and scalable security and compliance practices.

category + topics

Expert Insights
Compliance
GRC
Subscribe to the Trusted Newsletter
Get biweekly expert insights so you never miss what’s next.

Chart Your Course

Navigate to new worlds of trust with Drata.