A lean energy technology company was running three separate SOC 2 programs out of a single GRC function, with ISO expansion already on the roadmap and a growing customer assurance workload piling on top. The incumbent platform was not keeping up. Evidence access was unreliable, reminder workflows were too limited, and every customer questionnaire had to be answered from scratch. The team needed a system built for how they actually operated, not how a single-entity compliance program would.
[ The Problem ]
One person, three compliance programs, and a platform that made every task harder.
The GRC owner was solely responsible for SOC 2 compliance across three legal entities while preparing for ISO 9001 certification and fielding an increasing volume of customer security reviews. The incumbent platform compounded the burden at every step: a single-reminder limit meant tasks fell through the cracks, auditors could not reliably access evidence without manual re-uploads, and questionnaire responses could not be reused when customers required portal-based submissions.
With no additional headcount on the horizon, the cost of staying on the incumbent was not just frustration. It was the risk that compliance programs across the portfolio would stall entirely.
[ What they needed ]
The team needed to accomplish all of the following without adding staff:
- Manage SOC 2 programs across three separate legal entities from a single administrative function
- Give auditors reliable, direct access to collected evidence without manual re-uploading
- Automate recurring task reminders beyond a single notification per item
- Reuse questionnaire responses instead of rebuilding answers for every customer request
- Reduce manual document sharing for customer security reviews
- Prepare a credible path to ISO 9001 and eventual ISO 27001 without recreating controls from scratch
- Build a commercial structure that could scale across the portfolio without future pricing surprises
[ Why Drata won ]
Selected over Tugboat Logic, which could not match Drata's multi-entity Workspaces architecture or its combined compliance and customer assurance automation in a single platform.
Workspaces matched the actual staffing model: the GRC owner explicitly recognized that the alternative multi-instance approach would triple administrative overhead. Workspaces allowed shared controls where appropriate while preserving entity-level separation, making a one-person function viable across three programs.
Auditor access was a documented incumbent failure: Tugboat's unreliable evidence visibility had created recurring manual work. Drata's in-platform audit workflow gave a direct and credible answer to a problem the buyer had already experienced firsthand.
Trust Center addressed a second, growing workload center: customer questionnaire burden and manual document sharing were not peripheral concerns. Bundling compliance automation with Trust Center and AI-assisted questionnaire workflows meant the buyer was solving two operational problems in one commercial motion.
Commercial structure survived procurement scrutiny: pricing clarity, pre-negotiated workspace add-on rates, a renewal cap, and discount transparency allowed the GRC owner to translate the operational case into a defensible package for the procurement stakeholder, which was a prerequisite for approval.
[ How Drata solved it ]
Drata Workspaces resolved the core architectural problem: the GRC owner could manage shared corporate controls once and apply them across all three entities, while preserving entity-level separation for technical controls, frameworks, and audits. That directly reduced the forecasted administrative burden of running three parallel programs.
Audit Hub addressed the most acute incumbent failure by making collected evidence available to auditors inside the platform, eliminating the manual re-upload cycle that had been consuming team time. Automated workflow and reminder capabilities replaced the single-notification limit that had allowed tasks to slip.
Trust Center and AI-assisted questionnaire workflows tackled the customer assurance burden as a second workload center. Approved-domain access and reusable response content reduced the manual effort required for each inbound security review. For ISO 9001, a custom framework approach provided an immediate path forward, with a defined migration plan once the native framework became available.
[ Before and after Drata ]
Before Drata, a single GRC owner was absorbing the full administrative weight of three separate compliance programs on a platform that could not automate reliably, share evidence cleanly, or reuse customer-facing content.
After, Workspaces consolidate shared control work across all three entities, auditors access evidence directly inside the platform, and the Trust Center handles routine customer security requests without manual intervention.
[ Business outcome ]
A one-person GRC function that had been stretched across three entities now has an architecture that matches the staffing model. Shared controls and centralized evidence management mean compliance work is done once where appropriate, not duplicated across every entity.
The customer assurance workload that had been growing without a scalable answer is now handled through a Trust Center that deflects routine requests automatically. The team enters its next audit cycle with a platform built for the operating model it actually runs, and a commercial structure that protects against cost surprises as the portfolio grows.